135mm and 200mm lenses are suitable for wide angle star-field views, and comet and asteroid hunting, while 300mm lenses serve very well for the Andromeda galaxy, large emission nebulae, open clusters, and even larger globular clusters. In my test, nikon have the same color correction than Canon and same sharpness. Hey Trevor, great article! It just doesn't get any better than this!
The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography - Articles How good this lens overall and how sharp and color-free? Will this ever get old? My guidescope is a 5in F5 Jaeger's achromat with a 2.3x Barlow, and a 9mm illuminated reticle eyepiece. But you couldn't have because you don't know even as much as this guy. There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. For me, that's enough. Colour and contrast is great. Weight. Nice image, andysea. Image quality, weight and value for money. Best lenses for astrophotography: 50, 85 and 135mm - DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging - Cloudy Nights Cloudy Nights Astrophotography and Sketching DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Also, the newer and much more expensive 200mm F4 SMC Pentax with the K mount is decisively inferior, showing small but annoying red chromatic aberration. This photo was captured with the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens using a UV/IR cut filter and a QHY168C dedicated astronomy camera. $399 00. Could use a few updates. There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. The shallow depth of field present at its maximum aperture does indeed create a pleasing bokeh. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. I own Samyang 135 f2 for Nikon Mount and indeed it is incredible value lens. ", I'd no problem with that. CP+ 2023: Sigma has announced it is bringing its trio of DC DN APS-C prime lenses to Nikon's Z mount: its first lenses for Nikon's mirrorless system. Whereas quality apochromats can be corrected with broad band filters, such as the Astronomik UV/IR cut filter or the CLS-CCD filter, telephoto lenses can not. Required fields are marked *. If you want to preview the image field you can expect with a particular camera sensor and lens combination, Stellarium features a useful tool. You may need to stop down to control star bloat, and thats exactly what Ive done with this 135. Oh and it's stabilised. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. for sample photos and video tour, This is simply the best Canon prime lens that I have tested. I really like how they augment my longer focal length scopes. Overall, the lens feels very solid and well constructed. SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). Diffraction from the cheap EF-s kit zoom lens was uneven. I know this is a very old article but I was re reading as I mulled over this very point (85/1.4 vs 135/1.8) and I've gotta point out this math is all wrong First off 85->135 is a 1.6x crop and a 1.6x crop will yield 16MP on 42MP bodies (42 / (1.6x1.6) ), ~20MP on the A1, and ~24MP on the A7R IV. Equipment used was an astromodified Canon 700D, Samyang 135mm f2, SkyTech Triband filter, Star Adventurer 2i, ZWO mini finder with ASI120MM, guiding with PHD2 and polar alignment using sharpcap. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. Do you have a link to Yuri's photo stream? Litepanels Studio X2 Bi-Color LED Fresnel Light. AF is accurate and very fast. Sure, not all 135mm lenses are lightweightSigma's new 135mm F1.8 is rather heavy at 1130gbut if you look at the Samyang 135mm F2, which is pretty much flawless optically, it weighs only 830g. The duck and cat are really the only good shots. Olympus 75mm f1.82. Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses.
The Rokinon 135mm F/2 was Built for Astrophotography It's tiny compared to almost everything else in the 85-135 range, and used properly, it can produce results that hold up to my DC (all other factors being equal such as subject distance, f-stop, lighting, etc.). When stopped down to 49mm it really is indistinguishable from an APO, except it shows red chromatic aberration with modified cameras even with the UV/IR block or CLS-CCD filter. Contrasty, saturated, nice colours. Overall, spectacular lens. it is crisp, fast, and awsome. http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. If the telescope mount is precisely aligned to the celestial north pole, unguided exposures of one to two minutes are possible. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? These lenses can be had on eBay in mint condition for around $70, and are probably the most price efficient optical instrument in the world. You currently have javascript disabled. No telephoto lens, and no apochromat, is sufficiently corrected to accomodate such a wide spectral range. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. I thought I would miss shooting at 200mm, but 135mm is long enough for most portraits and gives a decent amount of compression. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. Great post; thanks for the detailed information. Built quality is wonderful, focus ring is well-damped. Also, accurate guiding is essential. That's a cheap, fun date for AP. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. the EOS-clip filters are compatible with all EF lenses but not with the EF-s. My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). For my purposes, this is a spectacular lens. Let's unbox, review and test this lens to find out why it is one of the best bang for your buck deals in astrophotography! The criterion I used in evaluating lenses was optical perfection with no reservations. This brings me to my question.
Canon 135mm f/2 L Review - Ken Rockwell Astrophotography is one of the ultimate tests of lens quality, as long exposure photography of deep-sky objects in space can highlight issues that are hidden during daytime photography. Some APOs can be fitted with pricey telecompressors, but those invariably result in vignetting and coma. Explore the sky, try frame some targets and see what works well with your DSLR and lens combination.
Samyang 135mm F2 0 ED penoklatkowy obiektyw asferyczny tel Lior, I have done a lot of reading on modern zoom lenses.
Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM lens. How good it is? - Cloudy Nights MCovington, my Zeiss 300/4 is the full thickness barrel version, made in West Germany, serial number 5990836. The 135mm f2.8 in particular can take amazing photos of the brighter deep sky objects with about 1 second time . When I was teaching photography in 70's at a junior college, I critiqued students photos, but I never did so harshly. Some people may disagree with the vignetting being a good thing or not, but thats a matter of taste I guess. I stopped reading after the part where someone I don't know told me I "should" be doing something. A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. It improves slightly stopped down. I mount it on my APS-C camera and the focal length literally becomes 216 mm, which is too tight. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. But, since fast 300mm ED lenses are beyond my toy budget, I would appreciate seeing magnified center and corner test images of actual star fields. This is one of the sharpest lens i've ever owned. Along with improvements in telescope mounts, camera technology, filters, and digital image processing, these have allowed amateurs to produce astrophotographs of nearly professional quality. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO The Olympus Zuiko 180/2.8 and 100/2.8 impressed me in the 1980s, but in the digital era they are not so sharp. The lenses I listed are certainly not the ONLY exceptional lenses made over the years. Aperture ring. However, I find the process tedious, and prefer single, manually guided, long exposures which seem to have deeper colors. I do not see much difference in background blur or bokeh. Meanwhile the ol' Canon 135/2 is still commanding a higher than average price on the used market (70%+ of MSRP isn't common), I guess the low weight and super easy resale have almost made it a high end commodity. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. Together they still weight less than any modern 135mm :>. A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. She's cold? It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. This free website's biggest source of support is when you use these links, especially these directly to it at Adorama or at Amazon, when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Used with a FF body the DOF can be unforgiving, but if you nail focus the results can be magnificent. Pocketable. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. One is the price, which starts around $800 for the smallest units, and rapidly climbs into thousands of dollars for larger apertures. It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. Taking images at this focal length from the city will swell issues with gradients, especially when shooting towards the light dome. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market.
AstroBin It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. This is one of my all time favourites. Nevertheless, it performs excellently on most star fields, and is too cheap not to acquire. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. Still - a great portrait lens when used at f/2.8 or f/4, with a creamy bokeh indeed. Adam007,"a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels"No thanks. But even better BOKEH is the SAL-135F2.8F4.5 STF (Smooth Trans Focus ) which has even better BOKEH, albeit a manual focus lens. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. These include canon lens for night photography along with good budget lenses for astrophotography. Your images have a chance at remaining sharper once critical focus has been achieved, but now you have lost the extra light-gathering power you wanted. I owned this lens for a long time, then traded it for the 70-200 2.8IS II. Also Nikon DC 135mm f/2 is a great lens, a little better than 135mm Canon Also, when shooting the heart nebula, is the sky tracker a must or not required?
Best lenses for astrophotography: 50, 85 and 135mm - DSLR, Mirrorless I had one question that i cant seem to find an answer to.. So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience. The spec sheet for the Rokinon 135mm F/2 boasts a number of qualities, with the ones listed below being the most important when it comes to night photography and astro. Standards have risen in recent years. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. Theres no image stabilization on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 either, but thats a non-issue for amateur astrophotographers. Perhaps this impression of unreal sharpness is strengthened by the contrast to the extremely creamy bokeh you typically get in the same photo. With an effective focal length of roughly 216mm when coupled with a Canon crop sensor body, the field of view is nearly identical to the one youd find on a full-frame camera with a 200mm telephoto lens. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. Although this lens feels solid, it is rather light when compared to a telescope. I wish every lens was this good!!